{"id":3776,"date":"2012-09-05T04:11:45","date_gmt":"2012-09-05T11:11:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/?page_id=3776"},"modified":"2018-02-10T10:03:27","modified_gmt":"2018-02-10T18:03:27","slug":"punto-tt-5-sp","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/es\/punto-tt-5-sp\/","title":{"rendered":"Punto TT-5 (Sp)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Punto TT-5: Comunicado afirmando que el Polvo del World Trade Center
Punto TT-5:<\/span> No Contenn\u00eda Materiales Pirot\u00e9cnicos<\/h4>\n
\n

<< Punto anterior<\/a>, Siguiente punto >><\/a><\/p>\n

<\/a>La Versi\u00f3n Oficial<\/div>\n

Si bien el Instituto Nacional de Est\u00e1ndares y Tecnolog\u00eda no realiz\u00f3 pruebas [1]<\/a> para determinar si hab\u00eda materiales pirot\u00e9cnicos (como la termita) o explosivos (como RDX\/ ciclonita y nanotermita) en el polvo del World Trade Center, declar\u00f3 [2]<\/a> que dichos materiales no se hallaban en el mismo.<\/p>\n

<\/a>La Evidencia Revisada<\/div>\n

Material nanot\u00e9rmico sin reaccionar, \u201cque puede ser adaptado para comportarse [3]<\/a> como un pirot\u00e9cnico (como la termita) o como un explosivo\u201d [4]<\/a> fue hallado en cuatro muestras de polvo del World Trade Center recolectadas independientemente [5]<\/a> (como fue reportado en un art\u00edculo escrito por varios autores en una revista revisada por pares). [6]<\/a><\/p>\n

<< Punto anterior<\/a>, Siguiente punto >><\/a><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Referencias para el Punto TT-5<\/div>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
[1]<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\nNIST, Answers to Frequently Asked Questions<\/i><\/a> (August 30, 2006), Question 12.\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
[2]<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\nNIST conducted only a hypothetical experiment and \u201cfound no evidence of any blast events.\u201d NIST NCSTAR 1-9. Structural Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of World Trade Center Building 7, Draft for Public Comment<\/i><\/a>. August 2008, p. 357.\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
[3]<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\nThe quoted phrase is from Dr. Niels Harrit<\/a>, Associate Professor of Chemistry at the Nano-Science Center, University of Copenhagen. Email to Elizabeth Woodworth<\/a>, copied to Dr. David Ray Griffin<\/a>, June 19, 2011.\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
[4]<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\nThe AMPTIAC<\/span> Quarterly Newsletter<\/i><\/a> from the Spring of 2002 said: \u201cThe 221st National Meeting of the American Chemical Society held during April 2001 in San Diego featured a symposium on Defense Applications of Nanomaterials. One of the 4 sessions was titled Nanoenergetics. This session featured speakers from government labs (DOD and DOE) and academia. … A number of topics were covered, including … Metastable Intermolecular Composites (MICs), sol-gels, and structural nanomaterials. … At this point in time, all of the military services and some DOE and academic laboratories have active R&D programs aimed at exploiting the unique properties of nanomaterials that have potential to be used in energetic formulations for advanced explosives and propellant applications. … Nanomaterials, especially nanoenergetics, could be used for improving components of munitions. … Nanoenergetics hold promise as useful ingredients for the thermobaric (TBX)<\/a> and TBX-like weapons, particularly due to their high degree of tailorability with regards to energy release and impulse management.\u201d (pp. 43-44).\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
[5]<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\nDr. Steven Jones<\/a> discusses the \u201cchain of custody\u201d of the dust samples in \u201c9\/11: Explosive Testimony Exclusive … 1 of 2<\/a>\u201d (versi\u00f3n subtitulada<\/a>) at 3:30 and 7:58 minutes, and at 0 minutes in \u201c … 2 of 2<\/a>\u201d.\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
[6]<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\nNiels H. Harrit<\/a>, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones<\/a>, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, and Bradley R. Larsen, \u201cActive Thermitic Material Observed in Dust from the 9\/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe<\/a>\u201d (archive copy<\/a>), The Open Chemical Physics Journal<\/i>, 2009, 2: 7-31.\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punto TT-5: Comunicado afirmando que el Polvo del World Trade Center
Punto TT-5: No Contenn\u00eda Materiales Pirot\u00e9cnicos <\/p>\n

<< Punto anterior<\/a>, Siguiente punto >><\/a><\/p>\n

<\/a>La Versi\u00f3n Oficial <\/p>\n

Si bien el Instituto Nacional de Est\u00e1ndares y Tecnolog\u00eda no realiz\u00f3 pruebas [1]<\/a> para determinar si hab\u00eda materiales pirot\u00e9cnicos (como la […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":108,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":147,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3776","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3776","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/108"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3776"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3776\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19773,"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3776\/revisions\/19773"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3776"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}