{"id":4236,"date":"2012-11-30T08:08:07","date_gmt":"2012-11-30T16:08:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/?page_id=4236"},"modified":"2018-02-08T14:32:28","modified_gmt":"2018-02-08T22:32:28","slug":"punto-tt-5-it","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/it\/punto-tt-5-it\/","title":{"rendered":"Punto TT-5 (IT)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Punto TT-5: L’affermazione che la polvere del World Trade Center non
Punto TT-5:<\/span> contenesse tracce di materiale termitico<\/h4>\n
\n

<< Punto precedente<\/a>, Punto successivo >><\/a><\/p>\n

<\/a>La versione ufficiale<\/div>\n

Pur non avendo mai effettuato test [1]<\/a> che determinassero la presenza di materiale incendiario (come la termite) o di esplosivi (come l’RDX e la nanotermite) nella polvere del WTC, il NIST ha affermato [2]<\/a> che tali materiali non fossero presenti.<\/p>\n

<\/a>Le prove migliori<\/div>\n

Materiale nanotermitico inesploso, \u201cche pu\u00f2 essere adattato [3]<\/a> per comportarsi come un incendiario (es. la termite comune), o come un esplosivo,\u201d [4]<\/a> \u00e8 stato trovato in quattro campioni di polvere del WTC raccolti separatamente [5]<\/a> (come riferito [6]<\/a> in un articolo firmato da pi\u00f9 autori in una rivista peer-reviewed).<\/p>\n

<< Punto precedente<\/a>, Punto successivo >><\/a><\/p>\n

<\/a>Note di riferimento per il punto TT-5<\/div>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
[1]<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\nNIST, Answers to Frequently Asked Questions<\/i><\/a> (30 agosto 2006), domanda 12.\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
[2]<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\nIl NIST ha condotto solo un esperimento teorico e \u201cnon ha trovato prove di esplosioni.\u201d NIST NCSTAR 1-9. Structural Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of World Trade Center Building 7, Draft for Public Comment<\/i><\/a>. Agosto 2008, p. 357.\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
[3]<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\nLa frase citata \u00e8 del dottor Niels Harrit<\/a>, professore associato di Chimica al Nano-Science Center dell’Universit\u00e0 di Copenhagen. Da un’email inviata ad Elizabeth Woodworth<\/a>, per conoscenza al dottor David Ray Griffin<\/a>, 19 giugno 2011.\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
[4]<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\nThe AMPTIAC<\/span> Quarterly Newsletter<\/i><\/a> from the Spring of 2002 said: \u201cThe 221st National Meeting of the American Chemical Society held during April 2001 in San Diego featured a symposium on Defense Applications of Nanomaterials. One of the 4 sessions was titled Nanoenergetics. This session featured speakers from government labs (DOD and DOE) and academia. … A number of topics were covered, including … Metastable Intermolecular Composites (MICs), sol-gels, and structural nanomaterials. … At this point in time, all of the military services and some DOE and academic laboratories have active R&D programs aimed at exploiting the unique properties of nanomaterials that have potential to be used in energetic formulations for advanced explosives and propellant applications. … Nanomaterials, especially nanoenergetics, could be used for improving components of munitions. … Nanoenergetics hold promise as useful ingredients for the thermobaric (TBX)<\/a> and TBX-like weapons, particularly due to their high degree of tailorability with regards to energy release and impulse management\u201d (pp. 43-44).\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
[5]<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\nDr. Steven Jones<\/a> discusses the \u201cchain of custody\u201d of the dust samples in \u201c9\/11: Explosive Testimony Exclusive … 1 of 2<\/a>\u201d (versione sottotitolata<\/a>) at 3:30 and 7:58 minutes, and at 0 minutes in \u201c … 2 of 2<\/a>\u201d.\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
[6]<\/a><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\nNiels H. Harrit<\/a>, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones<\/a>, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, and Bradley R. Larsen, \u201cActive Thermitic Material Observed in Dust from the 9\/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe<\/a>\u201d (archive copy<\/a>), The Open Chemical Physics Journal<\/i>, 2009, 2: 7-31.\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punto TT-5: L’affermazione che la polvere del World Trade Center non
Punto TT-5: contenesse tracce di materiale termitico <\/p>\n

<< Punto precedente<\/a>, Punto successivo >><\/a><\/p>\n

<\/a>La versione ufficiale <\/p>\n

Pur non avendo mai effettuato test [1]<\/a> che determinassero la presenza di materiale incendiario (come la termite) o di esplosivi (come […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":107,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":147,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4236","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4236","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/107"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4236"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4236\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19753,"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4236\/revisions\/19753"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.consensus911.org\/it\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4236"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}